I would also add all personal property as well because some of them own houses that they purchased with a fake id & ssn .
2 Likes
Linking my proposal to offer economic incentive to migrants to voluntarily leave: Pay Migrants to Leave: An Economic Incentive for Voluntary Departure
1 Like
Yep, a foreign country (especially where these people are from) will likely laugh at us and not pay and they will not allow them to land (a plane or vehicle with transport of aliens) into their country. If we punish the country for not paying then we may have to give up any trade/water/mineral/leases/visa we have in their country. Itâs a strategic problem that has to be dealt with for each country separately. But it can be done with the right forethought and foreign relations. I agree that the criminals need to go first, and also first, lock up the borders too (so they donât come right back). The United Nations institution appears to be corrupted (by global elites) as it is one of the perpetuators of assisting illegals into our country as well as western European countries. The United Nations needs to be redone or we need to pull out and the sooner the better.
2 Likes
Agree with deporting rather than jailing.
However, canât agree with letting others stay and get in line, even with a huge fine.
They are still benefitting by being here - and theyâre getting that benefit because they came here illegally.
Those who are in-line but remaining in their home country are NOT getting that benefit, so youâve still created an incentive to come here illegally.
I think the only way this gets solved from a stop-the-incoming-flood perspective is to make the consequences of illegal entry so significant that there is no benefit to coming here illegally over choosing the legal path.
I think that means if you jump the line, you never get to get back in it.
4 Likes
Bring illegal to a island . They will automatic come back original their country . ( because they are not poor people ! I know many Vietnamese illegal had payment 50k- 60k USD for a trip to USA !!! )
3 Likes
I think thatâs a point that is not well understood - itâs not just the poor and persecuted, itâs the wealthy who donât want to wait in line.
(and of course, those released from prison or mental instituteions and sent here.)
2 Likes
Sure . They are not poor . If they were payed for service in vietnam to get visa to Mexico , payed money for plane , payed for leader take them to border âŚâŚ and many legal people to help them too !!! We are need prosecute all .
3 Likes
This may be helpful.
- Deport all with felony criminal records whether in USA or in their home country⌠with some form of review for illegals with criminal records for simply opposing their governmentâs illegal laws ( i.e China, Russia, Iran)
- Give all illegals, particularly those coming within the last 4 years, notice that they have 3-6 months to voluntarily depart, they may sell all belongings & keep the proceeds
- After 6 months involuntarily deportation begins & those with the means must pay for their own relocation
- Countries who encouraged or assisted illegal migration should be charged dollar for dollar for relocation at minimum & perhaps reparations. Particularly those who opened their prisons & mental hospitals. This money would be taken from aid the USA gives to their country
- Illegals who have been here at least 10 years, have contributed to society, good citizens, speak English, no criminal record, can prove theyâve paid taxes for at least 3 years or who will agree to pay those back taxes should be given a chance for amnesty, special consideration given to those with children & superb records
- Those illegals who have been here 5 years with all of the above⌠case by case basis. Dreamers living the American Dream who also give back to America, society, their neighbors, and help pay for the American dream are welcome!
There are a lot of farmers, construction owners, etc. that rely on immigrants for a work source. What about giving the owners of these business the amount of visas they need for their work force? That way the ones that want to work, and not rely on welfare are getting the advantag.
I agree and disagree with this. I think illegal immigrnats whom have criminal records, living off wealth fare and not getting jobs and trying to get American dream or a semi normal life shouldnât be allowed to stay. But those who are pursuing legalizations have proper documentations shouldnât be deported unless they do not follow through with citizenship. I also think those here for refugee which most are not should be allowed to stay under certain terms.
I agree our country canât afford to take care of these people! We donât have the housing for them at all!
In my State Oregon we our super short on housing!
We donât a big hospital in our town & limited jobs. It just makes no sense to allow illegals here.
1 Like
Sorry, but it is illegal to come into this country without invitation. You donât just get to waltz across borders uninvited, unchecked and with no way to be tracked and identified.
There has to be a vetting process to make sure anyone wanting entry is of actual benefit to this country. And that vetting process shouldnât mean they get to dig in and root themselves in our country while that vetting process is taking place.
First and foremost if we donât have our own country in good shape, why would we let others in? It is then a drain on our system that is liken to 2 steps forward 1 step back. We just wouldnât be able to prosper in our own country. If you were poor, had barely anything for your own family and someone walked into your house and decided they were staying, werenât going to contribute little to nothing of value to help sustain themselves in your home would you want them there? Absolutely not.
âThru no fault of their ownâ doesnât even calculate. They chose to come here.
We have to put America first. We have to be able to support our own before we can support someone foreign. Until our children can live as good as they need to we should not let other people in across our borders. Not one red cent should go to accommodate anyone from another country until everyone in our country has what they need.
An âIllegal immigrantâ has already committed a crime by coming here illegally. So automatic denial.
My thoughts on citizenship, etcâŚ
- Any current type of criminal record means automatic & permanent denial
- Someone who will give birth in our country before they are legally a citizen will be denied - no more citizen by birth (yes I know this is a violation of 14th but please read on), because a family should be able to stay together and it should be in the parentâs birth country, not where they were trying to gain citizenship to - sometimes I feel that is abused and used as a foot in the door OR if there is a child born during their statutory period (aka GMC period; Good Moral Character) that child must then be considered to be in the statutory or GMC period as well; if the parents are sent back, so is the child
- Anyone earning citizenship here in the statutory period (aka GMC period) before permanent citizenship is awarded who incur ANY infractions of any degree in that time means automatic deportation and permanent ban from entry - no exceptions.
- During the GMC period for the continuous residency (first 5 years) there shall be no travel outside the US for more than 10 days and not more often than 1 time within a 12 month period
- Absence for more than 30 days will break continuous residency requirement and will result in deportation - (not sure if they should be allowed to reapply for citizenship or not after this - Iâm on the fence - I want to say no second chance - would depend on WHY they were absent so long - maybe itâs back to the end of the line situation but that may get abused as well) *sorry - rambling!
- Having any ties to criminal entities or persons - automatic and permanent ban
- Any new contact, affiliation or association to anyone in a criminal organization AFTER they begin their statutory (GMC) period means automatic deportation
I feel if there is any court processing that needs to take place involving people who have not yet achieved permanent citizenship, that the burden of paying those costs shall be on the country of origin, not the US taxpayers. If they have to pay for it and have to take them back maybe they will stop sending them to us.
Any US funds expended on applicants that are denied, deported back, etc should be the burden of the originating country to pay. NOT the US taxpayers.
These might be strict, but if we want good people to come to our country and be an asset and not a burden then we need to be picky in how we go about it. I am all for good people coming here, but taxpayers should not have to support them. They should come here ready, willing and able to support themselves.
If you got this far, thank you for reading.
Noncitizen children have bombarded our public school systems and placed horrible hardships on the system, the teachers, and the quality of education. We donât have the resources nor the finances to educate noncitizenâs children, let alone our own. We need to return them to their country of origin, and they can apply for citizenship legally.
2 Likes
I say anyone caught here illegally after a certain date is not allowed to ever enter the country again. Swift deportation, sell off belongings if we catch them here. But I seriously think we should give them a date. Like July 20th. That is 6 months from Trump taking office. If we go to round them up after, they are banned from coming back in, or applying for refuge, asylum, or citizenship. Most will deport themselves.
5 Likes
I totally agree.
Does that include deporting all, but the native americans then? Yâknow since they were here first and everyone else is a âillegal alienâ. I feel like this isnât often thought about in this conversation.
1 Like
If they have overstayed visa or other entry authorization they are then literally here illegally. Deportation should be to closest border by cheapest transportation. Detainment until deportation event, required within 60 days of arrest.
2 Likes
@Aukxsona Are you aware thatâs slavery?
(this is the same reply as previous, iâm figuring out how this works)
We need to revamp our asylum process!
To remain in the USA illegals must have a Resident Sponsor to remain in the USA .
The issue of deporting undocumented immigrants is complex and involves multiple legal, logistical, and ethical considerations. Here are some general steps that experts suggest could streamline the process, while ensuring itâs handled legally and humanely:
-
Enhance Border Security and Monitoring
⢠Improve Border Infrastructure: Upgrading border surveillance technology, adding personnel, and enhancing physical barriers in certain high-traffic areas can reduce the flow of undocumented immigrants, thus minimizing future deportations.
⢠Strengthen Collaboration with Border States: Enhanced collaboration with state governments can help share resources and data, creating a more effective system for border security. -
Prioritize Criminal Offenders
⢠Focus on Individuals with Criminal Records: Prioritizing the deportation of those with serious criminal records ensures that resources are directed toward individuals who pose a potential risk to public safety, which is often supported across political lines.
⢠Streamline the Deportation Process for Felons: By focusing on criminal cases, law enforcement can quickly identify and process individuals who may be subject to removal. -
Expand Legal Resources for Processing Cases Efficiently
⢠Increase Immigration Court Resources: The immigration court system is often overwhelmed with cases, leading to delays. Expanding resources, hiring additional judges, and updating case processing systems can help expedite cases and minimize backlogs.
⢠Implement Clear Case Prioritization: Cases that have higher public safety implications or clear legal grounds for deportation should be prioritized in the court system. -
Improve Data Sharing and Identification Systems
⢠Coordinate with State and Local Law Enforcement: Effective data sharing between federal immigration enforcement and local law enforcement agencies can help track individuals who are subject to deportation orders.
⢠Use Biometric Systems for Verification: Biometric systems for identification can reduce errors and ensure that deportation orders are executed accurately. -
Establish Clear Policies for Deportation Appeals
⢠Create a Standardized Appeal Process: A clear, fair, and standardized appeal process ensures that individuals who have legitimate claims for staying in the U.S. (e.g., asylum seekers or individuals with family ties) have an opportunity to make their case before deportation.
⢠Limit Appeals in Clear-Cut Cases: For cases that donât meet specific criteria, the appeals process could be limited to reduce delays and expedite deportation when warranted. -
Coordinate with Foreign Governments
⢠Negotiate Repatriation Agreements: Ensuring that other countries accept deported citizens requires diplomatic coordination. Establishing repatriation agreements can reduce delays and complications that arise when a country refuses to accept its citizens back.
⢠Support Repatriation Programs: Offering support to deported individuals can sometimes facilitate smoother transitions back to their home countries, potentially minimizing the chances of re-entry attempts. -
Implement Alternatives for Long-Term Undocumented Residents
⢠Consider Pathways for Certain Populations: For undocumented immigrants with long-standing ties, U.S.-born children, or a record of contributing to the community, an alternative to deportation (such as a legal residency pathway) may be a solution. This approach can focus resources on individuals who pose security risks rather than families or community members with deep ties.
Implementing these steps would require bipartisan support, additional funding, and a commitment to upholding legal and ethical standards. The overall goal would be to handle deportations in a way that ensures public safety, respects human rights, and is feasible within the current legal framework.
So with that being said, itâs a downhill battle in congress!
1 Like